1.
This is the 48th
Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report prepared by the
Environmental Team (ET), Cinotech Consultants Ltd.,
for “Trunk
Road T2”. This report summarized the monitoring results
and audits findings of the EM&A programme under the issued Environmental
Permit (EP) No. EP-451/2013 and in accordance with the EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013) during
the reporting month of February 2024.
2.
The main works of each works
contracts undertaken during the reporting period are as follows:
Table I Summary of Key
Construction Work in the Reporting Month
|
Contract
No.
|
Project
Title
|
Site
Activities
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
Trunk Road T2 and
Infrastructure Works for Developments at South Apron
|
·
West Ventilation Building RC Structure, ABWF, E&M
·
Launching Shaft / Cut & Cover RC Structure
·
Westbound TBM Tunnelling
·
Eastbound TBM Tunnelling
·
EB Service Gallery Installation
·
WB Service Gallery Installation
·
CP Tympanum Construction
·
CP TBM Excavation
·
Cross Passage Finishing
·
Sub-sea Corbel Construction
·
Sub-sea Crown Fire Board
·
Sub-sea Road Level Fire Board
·
Sub-sea OHVD Soffit Fire Board
·
Sub-sea Parapet Installation
·
SUS Remaining Internal Wall
·
Sub-sea OHVD Slab Installation
·
SUS Fire Board installation
·
Tunnel Segment delivery
·
MiMEP Module Installation
·
Sub-sea E&M Bracket installation
·
Sub-sea E&M Bracket drilling
·
Eastbound cavern excavation
|
|
ED/2020/03
|
Trunk Road T2 -
Traffic Control And Surveillance System (TCSS) and Associated Works(1)
|
N/A
|
|
Notes:
(1): No major
construction work was undertaken during reporting month.
N/A: Not applicable
|
3.
Implementation of the key
mitigation measures during the reporting period are as follows:
Table II Summary of Key Mitigation Measures
Implemented in the Reporting Month
|
Contract No. and Project
Title
|
Key Mitigation Measures
Implemented
|
|
ED/2018/04 - Trunk Road T2 and
Infrastructure Works for Developments at South Apron
|
Air Quality
·
Water spraying regularly on construction site area to avoid dust
generation.
·
Excavated dusty materials were covered by impervious sheets.
Noise
·
Air compressor was operated with door closed and have valid noise
labels.
·
Use of Quality Powered Mechanical Equipment (QPME)
·
Erecting noise barriers on site to minimize noise impact generated
from breaking activities.
Water Quality
·
WetSep was constructed to treat the surface
runoff prior to discharge.
Landscape and
Visual
·
Tree protection zone were fenced off to
protect the existing tree.
|
|
ED/2020/03 - Trunk Road T2 - Traffic
Control And Surveillance System (TCSS) and Associated Works(1)
|
N/A
|
|
Notes:
(1): No major
construction work was undertaken during reporting month.
N/A: Not
applicable
|
4.
Exceedance of Action/Limit levels
during the reporting month (February 2024) and the investigation results and/or
follow-up actions:
Air Quality Monitoring
·
No Action Level exceedance for
24-hour TSP was recorded.
·
No Limit Level exceedance for
24-hour TSP was recorded.
Construction Noise
Monitoring
·
No Limit Level exceedance for
day time construction noise was recorded in this reporting month.
·
No Action Level exceedance was recorded in this reporting month.
Landscape and Visual
Monitoring and Audit
·
No non-compliance of the
landscape and visual impact was recorded in the reporting month. The implementation
of landscape and visual and mitigation measures was checked by a Registered
Landscape Architect (RLA) during the environmental site inspections.
Table III
Summary of Complaint/Summons/Prosecution in the Reporting Month
|
Event
|
Event Details
|
Follow-up/ Remedial Actions
|
Status/ Remarks
|
|
Number
|
Brief Description
|
|
Complaints Received
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Notification of Summons and Prosecutions
Received
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Public Engagement Activities
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1)
No reporting change in this
reporting month.
2)
The key works or activities
will be anticipated in the next reporting period are as follows:
Table IV
Summary Table for Site Activities in the next Reporting Period
|
Contract
No. and Project Title
|
Site Activities (March 2024)
|
Key
Environmental Issues
|
|
ED/2018/04 - Trunk
Road T2 and Infrastructure Works for Developments at South Apron
|
1)
West Ventilation Building RC Structure, ABWF, E&M
2)
Launching Shaft / Cut & Cover RC Structure
3)
Westbound TBM Tunnelling
4)
Eastbound TBM Tunnelling
5)
EB Service Gallery Installation
6)
WB Service Gallery Installation
7)
CP Tympanum Construction
8)
CP TBM Excavation
9)
Cross Passage Finishing
10)
Sub-sea Corbel Construction
11)
Sub-sea Crown Fire Board
12)
Sub-sea Road Level Fire Board
13)
Sub-sea OHVD Soffit Fire Board
14)
Sub-sea Parapet Installation
15)
SUS Remaining Internal Wall
16)
SUS Fire Board Road Level
17)
Tunnel Segment delivery
18)
Sub-sea OHVD Slab Installation
19)
MiMEP
Installation
20)
Sub-sea E&M Bracket installation
21)
Sub-sea E&M installation
22)
Sub-sea E&M drilling
23)
Eastbound cavern excavation
|
(A)
/ (B) / (C) / (D)
|
|
ED/2020/03 - Trunk
Road T2 - Traffic Control And Surveillance System (TCSS) and Associated Works(1)
|
1)
WVB Cabinets lifting
|
|
Notes:
(1):
No major construction work was undertaken during reporting month.
N/A: Not applicable
(A) Dust
generation from haul road, stockpile of
dusty materials, exposed site area, excavation works and rock breaking
activities;
(B) Noisy
construction activity such as rock-breaking activities and piling works
(C) Runoff from
exposed slope or site area; and
(D) Wastewater and
runoff discharge from site.
|
3)
According to the EM&A
Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), the
number and location of the monitoring stations and parameters should be
reviewed in every six months, or on as -needed basis, in order to cater for any
changes in the surrounding environmental and the nature of works in progress.
The latest review was conducted in January 2024 and the review of status and
location of monitoring stations are summarized as follow:
Table V Summary Table for Review of Status and
Location of Monitoring Stations
|
Monitoring
Station ID
|
Review
Status
|
Follow-up
Action/ Recommendation
|
|
KTD 2d
|
ET has reviewed the status and
location of KER1, KTD 1, KTD2d, CKL1 and CKL2. To conclude, the environmental
monitoring conducted at KER1, KTD 1, KTD2d, CKL 1 and CKL 2 are appropriate,
and the monitoring results reflect how the sensitive receiver(s) is/are
impacted by the construction activities of the Project.
|
N/A
|
|
KER1
|
|
KTD 1
|
|
CKL 1
|
|
CKL 2
|
|
N/A: Not
Applicable
|
1.1
In 2009, Civil Engineering and
Development Department (CEDD) commissioned a Kai Tak Development (KTD) – Trunk Road T2 and Infrastructure at South
Apron Investigation. The assignment covers the provision of
the Trunk Road T2 and its connections with the Central Kowloon Route (CKR) at
the north apron area and the Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel (TKOLTT) to the
south in the Cha Kwo Ling area.
1.2
The Trunk Road T2 Project is
one of the designated Projects under Schedule 2 of the EIAO proposed in the
KTD. CEDD submitted the Project Profile (No. PP-379/2009) on 24 March 2009 for
application for an EIA study brief for the Trunk Road T2 Project under the
EIAO. Accordingly, an EIA Study Brief (ESB-203/2009) for the Trunk Road T2
Project was issued on 30 April 2009.
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report for
the Trunk Road T2 Project was approved under the Environmental Impact
Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) on 19 September 2013. The corresponding
Environmental Permit (EP) was issued on 19 September 2013 (EP no.:
EP-451/2013).
1.3
The Contract No. ED/2018/04 is
the main contract of Trunk Road T2 (“T2 Main Works”) which comprises mainly the
design and construction of a dual two-lane trunk road of approximately 3.4km
long with about 3.1km of the trunk road in form of tunnel; ventilation and
administration buildings, environmental protection and mitigation works and
etc. Moreover, the Contract No. ED/2020/03 is the other contract under Truck
Road T2 Project which comprises mainly design and construction of the TCSS for
this Project. The EM&A programme at Kai Tak area
under the Contract ED/2018/04 and ED/2020/03 are governed by the EP-451/2013
and EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013). The work areas of the Trunk Road T2
Project are shown in Figure 1 and
the works to be executed under each Contract and corresponding EP are
summarized as follows:
|
Environmental
Permit
|
Works
Description
|
|
EP-451/2013 – Trunk Road T2
|
ED/2018/04
· Construction of highway and sub-sea tunnel
connecting between Central Kowloon Route and Cha Kwo Ling Tunnel
· Western & Eastern Ventilation Buildings
ED/2020/03
· Design and construction of TCSS for Trunk
Road T2
|
Monitoring
Works in Kai Tak under EP-451/2013
1.4
Under
Contract No. KL/2014/03 – Kai Tak Development – Stage 3 Infrastructure Works
for Development at the Southern Part of the Former Runway (“T2 Advance Works”),
the baseline monitoring works in Kai Tak under the EM&A Manual
(AEIAR-174/2013) were conducted by the Environmental Team (ET) for the Contract No. KL/2014/03 at the
approved relocated monitoring locations (EPD reference: EP2/K19/A/21 pt.5),
namely KTD1a, KTD2a & KER1a. During the impact monitoring period,
monitoring locations KTD 2a and KER 1a were relocated to new locations, i.e.
KTD 2b and KER 1b (EPD reference: ( ) in EP2/K19/A/21
pt. 6 and ( ) in EP2/K19/A/21 pt. 5) respectively. Location
KTD2b was then further relocated to location KTD2c, the proposal of such
relocation was submitted to EPD on 24 March 2020 and was approved by EPD on 6
April 2020 (EPD reference: ( ) in EP2/K19/A/21 pt.7).
The aforementioned relocation was effective from 9 April 2020. Since the major
part of work under Contract No. KL/2014/03 has been completed and monitoring
works conducted by the ET of
Contract No. KL/2014/03 was determined to be ceased,
the impact monitoring within the
Kai Tak area was then handed over to the ET of Contract No. ED/2018/04 on 1
August 2020.The monitoring location has been reviewed and updated to obtain the
data with higher representative based on several conditions, such as distance
between monitoring location and the sensitive receiver, non-project related
interference, obstruction to the construction works on site and the power
supply problem. The monitoring location KTD1a and KER1b has been updated to the
monitoring location KTD1 and KER1 on 3 August 2020, where are the original
location as proposed in the EM&A manual (AEIAR-174/2013). And the
monitoring location KTD2c was remained unchanged after the aforementioned
review. Location KTD2c was then further relocated to
location KTD2d, the proposal of such relocation was submitted on 9 March 2021
and was approved by EPD on 3 27th 2021 (EPD reference: ( ) in EP2/K19/A/21 pt.8). The aforementioned relocation was
effective from 24 May 2021. The impact monitoring for the three
stations KTD1, KTD2d and KER1 are currently conducted by the ET of T2 Main
Works
Monitoring Works in Cha Kwo Ling under
EP-451/2013
1.5
The environmental impact of the remaining
works in Cha Kwo Ling, under EP-451/2013, shall be monitored at the two
proposed stations, namely CKL1, CKL2, in accordance to the EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013). The impact monitoring for the two proposed stations
shall be conducted by the ET of T2 Main Works.
1.6
Cinotech Consultants
Ltd. Was designated as
the Environmental Team (ET) to
undertake the EM&A works for “Trunk
Road T2 and Infrastructure Works for Developments at the Former South Apron”
(hereinafter called the “Project”) and “Trunk Road T2 –Traffic Control &
Surveillance System (TCSS) and Associated Works”.
1.7
This is
the 48th Monthly EM&A Report which summarises the impact monitoring results and audit
findings for the EM&A programme during the
reporting period in February 2024.
1.8
Different Parties with
different levels of involvement in the Project organization include:
·
Permit Holder – Civil Engineering
and Development Department (CEDD)
·
Supervisor
Representative – Hyder-Meinhardt Joint Venture (HMJV)
·
Environmental Team (ET) – Cinotech Consultants Limited (Cinotech)
·
Independent Environmental
Checker (IEC) – Ramboll Hong Kong Limited (Ramboll)
·
Contractor – Bouygues Travaux
Publics (BTP) (For ED/2018/04) & GTECH Services (Hong Kong) Limited (For
ED/2020/03)
1.9
The key contacts of the Project are shown in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Key Project Contacts
|
Party
|
Role
|
Contact
Person
|
Phone No.
|
|
CEDD
|
Permit Holder
|
Mr. Wong Chi Wai, Tommy
|
3842 7111
|
|
HMJV
|
Supervisor Representative
|
Ms. Hazel Tang
|
2149 8524
|
|
Cinotech
|
Environmental Team
|
Mr. KS Lee (ETL)
|
2151 2091
|
|
Ms. Karina Chan
|
2157 3880
|
|
Ramboll
|
Independent Environmental
Checker
|
Mr. YH Hui
|
3465 2850
|
|
BTP
|
Contractor (ED/2018/04)
|
Mr. Roy Leung
|
6628 2685
|
|
GTECH
|
Contractor (ED/2020/03)
|
Mr. Deacon Choi
|
6038 3568
|
1.10
The Organizational Structure for Environmental Management is shown in Figure 1.2.
1.11
The major site activities
undertaken in the reporting month included:
Table
1.2 Summary of Key Construction Work
in the Reporting Month
|
Contract No.
|
Project Title
|
Site Activities
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
Trunk Road T2 and Infrastructure Works for
Developments at South Apron
|
·
West Ventilation Building RC Structure, ABWF, E&M
·
Launching Shaft / Cut & Cover RC Structure
·
Westbound TBM Tunnelling
·
Eastbound TBM Tunnelling
·
EB Service Gallery Installation
·
WB Service Gallery Installation
·
CP Tympanum Construction
·
CP TBM Excavation
·
Cross Passage Finishing
·
Sub-sea Corbel Construction
·
Sub-sea Crown Fire Board
·
Sub-sea Road Level Fire Board
·
Sub-sea OHVD Soffit Fire Board
·
Sub-sea Parapet Installation
·
SUS Remaining Internal Wall
·
Sub-sea OHVD Slab Installation
·
SUS Fire Board installation
·
Tunnel Segment delivery
·
MiMEP Module Installation
·
Sub-sea E&M Bracket installation
·
Sub-sea E&M Bracket drilling
·
Eastbound cavern excavation
|
|
ED/2020/03
|
Trunk Road T2 – Traffic Control And
Surveillance System (TCSS) and Associated Works(1)
|
N/A
|
|
Notes:
(1): No major construction work was undertaken
during reporting month.
N/A: Not applicable
|
1.12
The EM&A programme requires
construction noise, air quality monitoring and environmental site audit, etc.
The EM&A requirements for each parameter are described in the following
sections, including:
·
All monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit levels for all
environmental parameters;
·
Event Action Plans;
·
Environmental mitigation
measures, as recommended in the Project EIA Report.
1.13
The advice on the
implementation status of environmental protection and pollution
control/mitigation measures is summarized in Section 10 of this report.
1.14
This report presents the
monitoring results, observations, locations, equipment, period, methodology and
QA/QC procedures of the monitoring parameters of the required environmental
monitoring works and audit works for the Project in February 2024.
1.15
All permits/licenses obtained for the Project are summarized
in Table 1.3.
Table 1.3 Summary of Environmental License and
Permit
|
Contract
No.
|
Permit /
License No.
|
Valid
Period
|
Status
|
|
From
|
To
|
|
Environmental Permit (EP)
|
|
N/A
|
EP-451/2013
|
19 Sep 2013
|
N/A
|
Valid
|
|
Notification
pursuant to Air Pollution (Construction Dust) Regulation
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
Ref. No.: 451120
|
20 Nov 2019
|
N/A
|
Valid
|
|
ED/2020/03
|
Ref. No.: 483143
|
15 Aug 2022
|
N/A
|
Valid
|
|
Billing
Account for Construction Waste Disposal
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
A/C No.: 7036016
|
09 Dec 2019
|
N/A
|
Valid
|
|
ED/2020/03
|
A/C No.: 7043158
|
31 Jan 2022
|
N/A
|
Valid
|
|
Billing
Account for Vessel Disposal
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
A/C No.:7037747 (Application
No.: CEDD01209)
|
26 Oct 2023
|
25 Jan 2024
|
Valid
|
|
Construction
Noise Permit
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
CNP No. (For Launching
Shaft and Barging Point): GW- RE1513-23
|
7 Dec 2023
|
21 Feb 2024
|
Expired on 21 Feb 2024
|
|
CNP No. (For Portion Q):
GW- RE1557-23
|
21 Dec 2023
|
20 Apr 2024
|
Valid
|
|
CNP No. (For Depressed
Road): GW-RE0037-24
|
26 Jan 2024
|
28 Feb 2024
|
Expired on 28 Feb 2024
|
|
CNP No. (For Launching
Shaft and Barging Point): GW- RE0187-24
|
22 Feb 2024
|
21 Jun 2024
|
Valid
|
|
CNP No. (For Depressed
Road): GW-RE0160-24
|
28 Feb 2024
|
29 Apr 2024
|
Valid
|
|
Wastewater
Discharge License
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
WT00036183-2020 (For
Depressed Road Area)
|
27 Jul 2020
|
31 Jul 2025
|
Valid
|
|
WT00039117-2021 (For Site
Office and Support Area)
|
28 Sep 2021
|
30 Sep 2026
|
Valid
|
|
WT00036228-2020 (For
Launching Shaft)
|
10 Nov 2021
|
31 Jul 2025
|
Valid
|
|
Chemical Waste
Producer License
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
WPN: 5213-286-B2557-03
|
09 Mar 2020
|
N/A
|
Valid
|
|
Marine Dumping
Permit
|
|
ED/2018/04
|
EP/MD/24-067
|
3 Jan 2024
|
2 Apr 2024
|
Valid
|
2
2.1
According to the EM&A
Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), 24-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) monitoring
was conducted to monitor the air quality for this Project. For regular impact
monitoring, a sampling frequency of at least once in every six days at all of
the monitoring stations for 24-hour TSP monitoring. In case of complaints,
1-hour TSP monitoring should be conducted at least three times in every six
days when the highest dust impacts are likely to occur. Appendix A shows
the established Action/Limit Levels for the environmental monitoring works.
2.2
Five designated monitoring
stations were selected for air quality monitoring programme. Table 2.1
describes the air quality monitoring locations, which are also depicted in Figure
2.
2.3
The monitoring location at Kai
Tak area has been reviewed and updated to obtain the data with higher
representative based on several conditions, such as distance between monitoring
location and the sensitive receiver, non-project related interference, obstruction
to the construction works on site and the power supply problem. The monitoring
location KTD1a and KER1b has been updated to KTD1 and KER1 respectively, where
are the original location as proposed in the EM&A manual (AEIAR-174/2013).
And the monitoring location KTD2c was remained unchanged after the
aforementioned review. Monitoring location KTD2c was then further relocated to
KTD2d after the review of status and location of monitoring station conducted
in between February and March 2021.
Table 2.1 Air Quality Monitoring Locations
|
Monitoring Stations
|
Location
|
|
KTD1
|
Centre of Excellence in Paediatrics
(Children’s Hospital)
|
|
KTD2d
|
Next to the SOR
Office of Trunk Road T2 in Kai Tak Area
|
|
KER1
|
Future
Residential Development at Kerry Godown
|
|
CKL1
|
Flat 121 Cha Kwo
Ling Village
|
|
CKL2
|
Flat 103 Cha Kwo
Ling Village
|
|
|
2.4
Table 2.2 summarizes the monitoring parameters, monitoring period and frequencies
of impact air quality monitoring. The monitoring schedule is shown in Appendix
B.
Table 2.2
Frequency and Parameters of Air Quality Monitoring
|
Monitoring
Stations
|
Parameter
|
Period
|
Frequency
|
|
KTD1, KTD2d,
KER1, CKL1 & CKL2
|
1-hour TSP
|
0700 – 1900
|
3 times per 6 days (as
required in case of complaints)
|
|
KTD1, KTD2d,
KER1, CKL1 & CKL2
|
24-hour TSP
|
24 hours
|
Once every 6
days
|
|
|
2.5
High Volume Samplers (HVS) in compliance
with the specification stipulated in the EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013),
Section 2.2.1.4, were used to carry out 24-hour TSP monitoring. Direct reading
dust meter were also used to measure 1-hour average TSP levels. The 1-hour
sampling was determined by HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the
results measured by direct reading method.
2.6
Wind data monitoring equipment
was set at rooftop (about 41/F) of Yau Lai Estate Bik Lai House, Lam Tin for
logging wind speed and wind direction such that the wind sensors were clear of
obstructions or turbulence caused by building. The wind data monitoring
equipment was re-calibrated at least once every six months and the wind
directions were divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees each. Wind data is
attached in Appendix D.
2.7
Table 2.3 summarizes the equipment used for air quality monitoring. Copies of
calibration certificates are attached in Appendix C.
Table
2.3 Air Quality Monitoring
Equipment
|
Equipment
|
Model
|
Quantity
|
|
HVS Sampler
|
TISCH Model: TE-5170 (Serial no. 0723, 1956, 10595, 1316, 5280)
|
5
|
|
Calibrator
|
TISCH Model: TE-5025A (Serial no. 3864)
|
1
|
|
Wind Anemometer
|
Davis Weather Monitor II, Model no. 7440 (Serial no. MC01010A44)
|
1
|
1-hour TSP Monitoring
Measuring Procedures
2.8
The measuring procedures of the
1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual
as follows:
(Sibata Model No.:
LD-3B/LD-5R)
·
The 1-hour dust meter is placed
at least 1.3 meters above ground.
·
Set POWER to “ON” and make sure
that the battery level was not flash or in low level.
·
Allow the instrument to stand
for about 3 minutes and then the cap of the air sampling inlet has been
released.
·
Push the knob at MEASURE
position.
·
Set time/mode setting to [BG]
by pushing the time setting switch.
Then, start the background measurement by pushing the start/stop switch
once. It will take 6 sec. to complete the
background measurement.
·
Push the time setting switch to
change the time setting display to [MANUAL] at the bottom left of the liquid
crystal display. Finally, push the start/stop switch to stop the measuring
after 1 hour sampling.
·
Information such as sampling
date, time, count value and site condition were recorded during the monitoring
period.
Maintenance/Calibration
2.9
The following
maintenance/calibration is required for the 1-hour dust meter:
·
Check and calibrate the meter
by HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct
reading method at 2-month intervals throughout all stages of the air quality
monitoring.
24-hour TSP Monitoring
Instrumentation
2.10
High volume samplers (HVS)
(TISCH Model: TE-5170) complete with appropriate sampling inlets was employed
for 24-hour TSP monitoring. The sampler
was composed of a motor, a filter holder, a flow controller and a sampling
inlet and its performance specification complied with that required by USEPA
Standard Title 40, Code of Federation Regulations Chapter 1 (Part 50). Moreover,
the HVS also met all the requirements in Section 2.2 of the Annex II
Specification.
2.11
The positioning of the HVS
samplers are as follows:
·
A
horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the samplers against
gusty wind shall be provided;
·
No
two samplers shall be placed less than 2 meter apart;
·
The
distance between the sampler and an obstacle, such as buildings, must be at
least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the sampler;
·
A
minimum of 2 metres of separation from walls, parapets and penthouses is
required for rooftop samplers;
·
A
minimum of 2 metres of separation from any supporting structure, measured
horizontally is required;
·
No
furnace or incinerator flue is nearby;
·
Airflow
around the sampler is unrestricted;
·
The
sampler is more than 20 metres from the dripline;
·
Any
wire fence and gate, to protect the sampler, shall not cause any obstruction
during monitoring;
·
Permission
must be obtained to set up the samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring
stations; and
·
A
secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the samplers.
Operating/analytical
procedures for the operation of HVS
2.12
Operating/analytical procedures
for the air quality monitoring are highlighted as follows:
·
Prior to the commencement of
the dust sampling, the flow rate of the high volume
sampler was properly
set (between 0.6 m3/min. and 1.7 m3/min.) in accordance
with the EM&A manual (AEIAR-174/2013). The flow rate shall be indicated
on the flow rate chart.
·
For
TSP sampling, fiberglass filters with a collection efficiency of > 99% for
particles of 0.3μm diameter were used.
·
The
power supply was checked to ensure the sampler worked properly. On sampling, the sampler was operated for 5
minutes to establish thermal equilibrium before placing any filter media at the
designated air monitoring station.
·
The
filter holding frame was then removed by loosening the four nuts and a weighted
and conditioned filter was carefully centered with
the stamped number upwards, on a supporting screen.
·
The
filter was aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on
the outer edges of the filter. Then the
filter holding frame was tightened to the filter holder with swing bolts. The
applied pressure should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.
·
The
shelter lid was closed and secured with the aluminum
strip.
·
The
timer was then programmed. Information
was recorded on the record sheet, which included the starting time, the weather
condition and the filter number (the initial weight of the filter paper can be
found out by using the filter number).
·
After
sampling, the filter was removed and sent to the HOKLAS laboratory (High
Precision Chemical Testing Ltd.) for weighing.
The elapsed time was also recorded.
·
Before
weighing, all filters were equilibrated in a conditioning environment for 24
hours. The conditioning environment temperature should be between 25°C and 30°C
and not vary by more than ±3°C; the relative humidity (RH) should be < 50%
and not vary by more than ±5%. A convenient working RH
is 40%.
Maintenance/Calibration
2.13
The following
maintenance/calibration is required for the HVS:
·
The
high volume motors and their accessories were properly
maintained. Appropriate maintenance such as routine motor brushes replacement
and electrical wiring checking were made to ensure that the equipment and
necessary power supply are in good working condition.
·
High
volume samplers were calibrated at bi-monthly intervals using TE-5025A Calibration Kit
throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.
2.14
Impact air quality monitoring
was conducted at five monitoring stations as scheduled. The monitoring schedule
is shown in Appendix B.
2.15
No Action and no Limit Level
exceedance was recorded for 24-hour TSP monitoring in the reporting month. No
exceedance of 24-hour TSP were considered as project related and
no exceedance of 24-hour TSP were considered as non-project related.
Details of the exceedance are presented in Appendix M.
2.16
The air temperature, relative
humidity, and the precipitation data were obtained from daily extracts of Hong
Kong Observatory Climate Information Service. This weather information for the
reporting month is summarized in Appendix D.
2.17
The monitoring data and
graphical presentations of 24-hour TSP monitoring results are shown in Appendix
F.
2.18
According to field observations
observed in the reporting period, the major dust source identified at the
designated air quality monitoring stations are as follows:
Table 2.4
Major Dust Source during Air Quality Monitoring
|
Monitoring Stations
|
Major Dust Source
|
|
KTD 1 - Centre of Excellence in Paediatrics
(Children’s Hospital)
|
·
Project related
construction activities (i.e., Loading and unloading of C&D wastes,
drilling, crushing of material);
·
Vehicle movement
in the site;
·
Construction
activities at the nearby construction sites of New Acute Hospital; and,
·
Road traffic
along Shing Fung Road, Shing Cheong Road, Cheung Yip Street, Kai Hing Road
and Kwun Tong Bypass.
|
|
KER 1 – Future Residential Development at Kerry
Godown
|
|
KTD 2d – Next to the SOR Office of Trunk Road T2
in Kai Tak Area
|
·
Project related
construction activities (i.e., Loading and unloading of C&D material,
crushing of material);
·
Vehicle movement
in the site; and,
·
Non-project
related construction activities (i.e excavating
work, Loading and unloading of C&D wastes at the nearby construction site
of Additional District Cooling System at Kai Tak Development, Paul Y.
Engineering.)
|
|
CKL1 - Flat 121 Cha Kwo
Ling Village
|
Road Traffic
along Cha Kwo Ling Road
|
|
CKL2 - Flat 103 Cha Kwo
Ling Village
|
Road Traffic
along Cha Kwo Ling Road
|
|
|
2.19
The air monitoring data was compared
with the predictions in Table 4.14 of EIA Report, AEIAR-174/2013 (as approved
in 2013) as summarised in Table 2.6 for 24-hour TSP.
Table 2.6 Comparison of
24-hr TSP Monitoring Data with Predictions in EIA Report
|
Monitoring Stations
|
ASR ID
|
Predicted Maximum 24-hr TSP Concentration in EIA Report
(AEIAR-174/2013), μg/m3
|
Maximum 24-hr TSP Concentration in the Reporting Month
(February 2024),
μg/m3
|
|
KTD 1 - Centre of Excellence in Paediatrics (Children’s Hospital)
|
KTD3
|
126
|
36.0
|
|
KTD 2d – Next to the SOR Office of Trunk Road T2
in Kai Tak Area
|
N/A(1)
|
N/A(1)
|
94.3
|
|
KER 1 – Future Residential Development at Kerry Godown
|
KTD6
|
169
|
81.8
|
|
CKL1 - Flat 121 Cha Kwo
Ling Village
|
N/A(1)
|
N/A(1)
|
117.9
|
|
CKL2 - Flat 103 Cha Kwo
Ling Village
|
N/A(1)
|
N/A(1)
|
113.8
|
Remarks:
(1)
No 24-hr TSP concentration was predicted in EIA
Report (AEIAR-174/2013)
2.20
In the reporting month the
24-hour TSP concentration at KTD1 & KER1 were lower than the prediction in
the EIA Report, AEIAR-174/2013 (as approved in 2013). No Action and Limit level
exceedance for 24-hour TSP was recorded in the reporting period.
3.1
According to the
EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), construction noise monitoring was conducted to monitor the
construction noise arising from the construction activities. The regular
monitoring frequency for each monitoring station shall be on a weekly basis and
conduct one set of measurements between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays.
Appendix A shows the established
Action and Limit Levels for the environmental monitoring works.
3.2
Noise monitoring was conducted
at five designated monitoring stations, namely KTD1, KTD2d, KER1, CKL1 and CKL2
in the reporting period. Table 3.1 and
Figure 2 show the locations of these
stations.
3.3
The monitoring location at Kai
Tak area has been reviewed and updated to obtain the data with higher
representative based on several conditions, such as distance between monitoring
location and the sensitive receiver, non-project related interference, obstruction
to the construction works on site and the power supply problem. The monitoring
location KTD1a and KER1b has been updated to KTD1 and KER1 respectively, where
are the original location as proposed in the EM&A manual (AEIAR-174/2013).
And the monitoring location KTD2c was remained unchanged after the
aforementioned review. Monitoring location KTD2c was then further relocated to
KTD2d after the review of status and location of monitoring station conducted
in between February and March 2021.
Table 3.1 Noise Monitoring Stations
|
Monitoring Stations
|
Location
|
|
KTD1
|
Centre of Excellence in Paediatrics
(Children’s Hospital)
|
|
KTD2d
|
Next to the SOR Office of Trunk Road T2 in
Kai Tak Area
|
|
KER1
|
Future Residential Development at Kerry Godown
|
|
CKL1
|
Flat 121 Cha Kwo
Ling Village
|
|
CKL2
|
Flat 103 Cha Kwo
Ling Village
|
|
|
3.4
Table 3.2 summarizes the monitoring parameters,
frequency and total duration of monitoring.
The noise monitoring schedule is shown in Appendix B.
Table 3.2 Frequency and Parameters of Noise
Monitoring
|
Monitoring Stations
|
Time Period
|
Duration
|
Frequency
|
Parameter
|
Measurement
|
|
KTD1
|
0700-1900 hrs on normal weekdays
|
30 minutes
|
Once per week
|
L10(30 min.)
dB(A)
L90(30 min.)
dB(A)
Leq(30 min.) dB(A)
|
Façade Measurement
|
|
KTD2d
|
Free Field Measurement
|
|
KER1
|
Free Field Measurement
|
|
CKL1
|
Free Field Measurement
|
|
CKL2
|
Free Field Measurement
|
3.5
Integrating Sound Level Meter
was used for impact noise monitoring. The meters were Type 1 sound level meter
capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including
equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq)
and percentile sound pressure level (Lx) that also complied with
International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and
804:1985 (Type 1) specifications. Table 3.3 summarizes the noise monitoring
equipment being used within the reporting period. Copies of calibration
certificates are attached in Appendix G.
Table
3.3 Noise Monitoring Equipment
|
Equipment
|
Model
|
Quantity
|
|
Integrating Sound Level Meter
|
BSWA 308 (Serial no. 580287, 580238)
SVAN 957 (Serial no. 23852)
SVAN 959 (Serial no. 11275)
SVAN 979 (Serial no. 27189)
|
5
|
|
Calibrator
|
AWA6021A (Serial no. 1023253,1023064)
ST-120 (Serial no.,181001636)
SV 30A (Serial no. 10965)
|
4
|
3.6
The monitoring procedures are
as follows:
·
The monitoring station was normally be at a point 1m from the exterior of
the sensitive receivers building façade and be at a position 1.2m above the
ground.
·
For free field measurement, the
meter was positioned away from any nearby reflective surfaces. All
records for free field noise levels were adjusted with a correction of +3
dB(A).
·
The battery condition was
checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.
·
Parameters such as frequency
weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:
-
Frequency weighting: A
-
Time weighting: Fast
-
Time measurement: 30 minutes
·
Prior to and after each noise
measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94.0 dB at 1000
Hz. If the difference in
the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1.0 dB, the
measurement would be considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement would
be required after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
·
The wind speed was frequently
checked with the portable wind meter.
·
At the end of the monitoring
period, the Leq, L90 and L10
were recorded. In addition, site
conditions and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.
·
Noise monitoring would be
cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, and wind with a steady speed exceeding 5 m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s. Supplementary
monitoring would be
provided to ensure sufficient data would be obtained.
3.7
The microphone head of the
sound level meter and calibrator were cleaned with a soft cloth at quarterly
intervals.
3.8
The sound level meter and
calibrator were checked and calibrated at yearly intervals.
3.9
Immediately prior to and
following each noise measurement the accuracy of the sound level meter was
checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at
a known frequency. Measurements were accepted as valid only if the calibration
levels from before and after the noise measurement agree to within 1.0 dB.
3.10
Impact noise monitoring was
conducted at five monitoring stations as scheduled. The monitoring
schedule is shown in Appendix B. No
Action and Level exceedance was recorded for day time construction noise
monitoring in the reporting month.
3.11
Noise monitoring results and
graphical presentations are shown in Appendix
H.
3.12
According to field observations
observed in the reporting period, the major noise sources identified at the
noise monitoring stations are shown in Table
3.4.
Table 3.4 Other Noise Source Identified during
Noise Monitoring
|
Monitoring Stations
|
Major Noise Source
|
|
KTD 1
|
·
Project related
construction activities (Loading and unloading of C&D waste, travel of
vehicles, use of PME and other plants, and other construction activities);
·
Vehicle movement
in the site;
·
Road traffic
along Shing Cheong Road; and,
·
Non-project
related construction activities at the nearby construction site of New Acute
Hospital.
|
|
KTD 2d
|
·
Project related
construction activities (Loading and unloading of C&D waste, travel of vehicles,
use of PME and other plants, and other construction activities);
·
Vehicle movement
in the site; and,
·
Non-project
related construction activities. (i.e excavating
work, Loading and unloading of C&D wastes at the nearby construction site
of Additional District Cooling System at Kai Tak Development, Paul Y.
Engineering.)
|
|
KER 1
|
·
Road traffic
along Kai Hing Road.
·
Project related
construction activities (Travel of vehicles, use of PME and other plants, and
other construction activities)
|
|
CKL1
|
Road traffic along Cha Kwo Ling Road.
|
|
CKL2
|
Road traffic along Cha Kwo Ling Road
|
3.13
The baseline noise level and
the Noise Limit Level at each designated noise monitoring station are presented
in Table 3.5.
Table 3.5 Baseline Noise
Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring Stations
|
Monitoring Stations
|
Baseline Noise Level, dB (A)
(at 0700 – 1900 hrs on normal weekdays)
|
Noise Limit Level, dB (A) (at 0700 –
1900 hrs on normal weekdays)
|
|
KTD1
|
78
|
75
|
|
KTD2d
|
64
|
|
KER1
|
65
|
|
CKL1
|
72.4
|
|
CKL2
|
71.4
|
3.14
The noise monitoring data was
compared with the predictions in Table 5.13 of EIA Report (AEIAR-174/2013) as
summarised in Table 3.6.
Table 3.6 Maximum Predicted Mitigated Construction
Noise Levels in EIA Report
|
Monitoring Stations
|
NSR ID
|
Maximum Predicted Mitigated Construction Noise Levels in EIA
Report (AEIAR-174/2013),
dB(A)
|
Maximum Construction
Noise Levels in the Reporting Month
(February 2024),
Leq (30min) dB(A)
|
|
KTD1 - Centre of Excellence in Paediatrics (Children’s Hospital)
|
KTD1
|
74
|
72.1
|
|
KTD2d – Next to the SOR Office of Trunk Road T2 in Kai Tak Area
|
N/A(1)
|
N/A(1)
|
63.0
|
|
KER1 – Future Residential Development at Kerry Godown
|
KER1
|
75
|
74.0
|
|
CKL1 - Flat
121 Cha Kwo Ling Village
|
CKL4
|
71
|
73.0
|
|
CKL2 - Flat
103 Cha Kwo Ling Village
|
CKL5
|
69
|
74.0
|
|
Remarks:
(1): No Maximum Predicted Mitigated Construction Noise Levels was
predicted in EIA Report (AEIAR-174/2013)
|
3.15
The results at CKL1 and CKL2 were
higher than the maximum predicted mitigated construction noise level in the EIA
Report, AEIAR-174/2013 (as approved in 2013), this may be due to fluctuations
of traffic flow along the traffic flow along Cha Kwo Ling Road throughout the
day. Besides, the result at KER1 and KTD1 were lower than the maximum predicted
mitigated construction noise level in the EIA Report. No Action and Limit Level
exceedance were recorded in the reporting period.
4.1
According to Section 4.3.1.1 of
EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), no water quality monitoring is required
during the construction phase.
4.2
According to Section 4.3.1.5 of
EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013),
compliance site audits are to be undertaken by the Engineer and ET and escorted
by the Contractor to ensure that a valid discharge license has been issued by
the EPD prior to the discharge of the effluent from the construction activities
of the Project site. Monitoring of the quality of the treated effluent from the
works areas should be carried out in accordance with the Water Pollution
Control Ordinance (WPCO) license. The audit results reflect whether the effluent
quality is in compliance with the discharge license requirements, the summaries of site audits are attached in Appendix I.
4.3
In the event of non-compliance
the responsibilities of the relevant parties is detailed in the Event / Action
plan attached in Appendix J.
5.1
According to Section 5.3.1.1 of
EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), ET will be required to undertake audit of good site practice for
habitat protection as detailed below. The summaries of site audits are attached
in Appendix I.
·
Avoid damage and disturbance to
the remaining and surrounding natural habitat;
·
Ensure placement of equipment
is within designated areas within the existing disturbed land;
·
Ensure construction activities
are restricted to within the proposed works boundary;
·
Ensure spoil heaps are be
covered at all times;
·
Ensure that disturbed areas are
reinstated immediately after completion of the works; and
·
Ensure enhancement planting
works undertaken.
6.1
According to Section 6.3.1.2 of
EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), no specific fisheries monitoring and audit programme is required
during the construction phase.
6.2
The implementation of the water
quality mitigation measures stated in the Water Quality Impact Assessment
(Refer to Section 6 of the EIA Report (AEIAR-174/2013)) will be audited as part of the
EM&A procedures during the construction period and the details are
presented in Section 4.2 of this
Report. The summaries of site audits are attached in Appendix I.
7.1
According to the EM&A
Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), a series of mitigation measures were recommended to ameliorate the
landscape and visual impacts of the Project. The mitigation measures for
construction stage are summarized in Table
7.1 below and provided in Appendix K:
Table 7.1 Construction Phase Landscape and Visual
Mitigation Measures
|
ID No.
|
Landscape and Visual
Mitigation Measure
|
|
CM1
|
All works shall be carefully designed to minimize impacts on existing landscape resources and visually
sensitive receivers. Existing trees within works area shall be retained and
protected.
|
|
CM2
|
Existing trees of good
quality and condition that are unavoidably affected by the works should be
transplanted.
|
|
CM3
|
Not used.
|
|
CM4
|
Not used.
|
|
CM5
|
Large temporary stockpiles of excavated material shall be covered with unobtrusive sheeting to prevent dust and dirt spreading
to adjacent landscape areas and vegetation, and to create a neat and tidy visual appearance.
|
|
CM6
|
Construction plant and building material shall be orderly and carefully
stored in order to
create a neat and tidy visual appearance
|
|
CM7
|
Erection of decorative screen hoarding should be designed to be compatible
with the existing urban
context.
|
|
CM8
|
All lighting in construction site shall be carefully controlled to minimize
light pollution and night-time
glare to nearby residences and GIC user. The contractor shall consider other security measures, which
shall minimize the visual impacts.
|
7.2
A specialist Landscape
Sub-Contractor should be employed by the Contractor for the implementation of
landscape construction works and subsequent maintenance operations during the
establishment period. It is proposed that the planting works will be on-site
and the planting should be completed during the construction contract. The
monitoring of the planting establishment should be undertaken for a 12 month
period which could extend throughout the Contractor’s one-year maintenance
period, which will be within the first operational year of the Project.
7.3
All measures undertaken by both
the Contractor and the specialist Landscape Sub-Contractor during the
construction phase and first year of the operational phase shall be audited by
a Registered Landscape Architect (RLA), as a member of the Environmental Team
(ET), on a regular basis to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the
measures. To fulfil the aforementioned requirements, on-site landscape and
visual mitigation measures were audited by RLA in the reporting month.
7.4
According to Section 7.3.1.2 of
the EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), site audits shall be undertaken at least
once every two weeks throughout the construction period to monitor and audit
the timely implementation of landscape and visual mitigation measures within
the site boundaries of this Project.
7.5
The
broad scope of the audit is detailed below but should also be undertaken with
reference to the more specific checklist provided in Table 7.2. The
summaries of site audits are attached in Appendix
I:
·
The extent of the agreed works areas should be
regularly checked during the construction phase. Any trespass by the Contractor
outside the limit of the works, including any damage to existing trees and soft
landscape areas shall be prohibited;
·
the progress of the engineering works should be
regularly reviewed on site to identify the earliest practical opportunities for
the landscape works to be undertaken;
·
all existing trees and vegetation within the study
area which are not directly affected by the works are retained and protected;
·
the methods of protecting existing vegetation proposed
by the Contractor are acceptable
and enforced;
·
preparation, lifting transport and re-planting
operations for any transplanted trees;
·
all landscaping works are carried out in accordance
with the specifications;
·
the planting of new trees, shrubs, groundcover,
climbers, ferns, grasses and other plans, together with the replanting of any
transplanted trees are carried out properly and within the right season; and
·
all necessary horticultural operations and replacement
planting are undertaken
throughout
the Establishment Period to ensure the healthy establishment and growth of both
transplanted trees and all newly established plants.
Table 7.2 Construction Phase Audit Checklist for Landscape and Visual Mitigation
Measures
|
Area of Works
|
Items to be Monitored
|
|
Advance planting
|
Monitoring of implementation
and maintenance of planting, and against possible incursion, physical damage,
fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc.
|
|
Protection of all trees and existing soft landscape areas to be
retained
|
Identification and demarcation of trees / vegetation to be retained, erection
of physical protection (e.g. fencing), monitoring against possible incursion,
physical damage, fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc.
|
|
Clearance of existing vegetation
|
Identification and demarcation of trees / vegetation to be cleared, checking
of extent of works to minimise damage, monitoring of adjacent areas against
possible incursion, physical damage, fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc.
|
|
Pruning of trees
|
Identification and demarcation of trees / vegetation to be pruned,
monitoring of extent of pruning to minimise damage, timing of operations,
implementation of all stages of preparatory and pruning works, and
maintenance of pruned vegetation, etc.
|
|
Plant supply
|
Monitoring of operations relating to the supply of specialist plant
material (including the collecting, germination and growth of plants from
seed) to ensure that plants will be available in time to be used within the
construction works.
|
|
Soiling, planting, etc.
|
Monitoring of implementation and maintenance of soiling and planting
works and against possible incursion, physical damage, fire, pollution,
surface erosion, etc.
|
|
Site fencing and hoarding
|
Implementation and maintenance, to ensure compliance with agreed
designs and check that it matches the surrounding environment and does not
cause visual intrusion.
|
|
Architectural treatment of engineering works.
|
Implementation and maintenance of mitigation measures, to ensure
compliance with agreed designs as applicable.
|
|
Establishment Works
|
Monitoring of implementation of maintenance operations during
Establishment Period.
|
7.6
In
the event of non-compliance the responsibilities of
the relevant parties is detailed in the Event / Action plan attached in Appendix
J.
7.7
In
the reporting month, no non-compliance of the landscape and visual mitigation
measures was recorded by RLA.
8.1
According
to Section 8.3.1.1 of EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), as a precautionary
measure, it is recommended that if any antiquity or supposed antiquity is
discovered during the course of the excavation works undertaken by the
Contractor, the discovery shall be reported to the AMO immediately and all
necessary measures taken to preserve it.
8.2
According
to Section 8.3.1.2 of EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), no EM&A is required
during the construction and operational phase.
9.1
According to Section 9.3.1.1 of EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), the
effective management of waste arisings during the construction phase will be
monitored through the site audit programme. Regular audits and site inspections should be
carried out by the Engineer, ET and Contractor to ensure that the recommended
good site practices and other mitigation measures are implemented by the
Contractor. The summaries of site audits are attached
in Appendix I.
9.2
According to Sections 9.3.1.3
and 9.3.1.4 of
EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013),
documents including licenses, permits, disposal and recycling records should be
reviewed and audited during site audits for the compliance with the legislation
and contract requirements to ensure proper records are being maintained and procedures
undertaken in accordance with the Waste Management Plan.
9.3
With
reference to the relevant handing records of this Project, the quantities of
different types of waste generated in the reporting month are summarized and
presented in the Appendix O.
10.1
Site audits were carried out on
a weekly basis to monitor the timely implementation of proper environmental
management practices and mitigation measures in the Project site. The summaries
of site audits are attached in Appendix
I.
10.2
Site audits for the each
contract were conducted as follows.
·
ED/2018/04 – Site audit were
conducted on 01, 08, 15, 22 & 29 February 2024 in the reporting month. Site
inspection of the IEC was conducted on 15 February 2024. No non-compliance was
observed during the site audit.
·
ED/2020/03 – Site audit was conducted
on 16 February 2024 in the reporting month.
10.3
According to Environmental
Permits, the approved EIA Reports (Register No.: AEIAR-174/2013 and
AEIAR-173/2013), and the EM&A Manuals of the Project (AEIAR-174/2013 and
AEIAR-173/2013), the mitigation measures detailed in
the documents are recommended to be implemented during the construction phase. An
Environmental Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS) is provided in Appendix K.
10.4
The ET weekly site inspections
were carried out during the reporting month and the observations and
recommendations are summarized in Table
10.1. Refer to Appendix I for
the site inspection summary reports in the reporting month.
Table
10.1 Observations and Recommendations
of Site Audit
|
Parameters
|
Date
|
Observations
and Recommendations
|
Follow-up
|
|
|
29 Feb
2024
|
|
To be reported
in the next reporting month.
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
25 Jan
2024
|
|
The stagnant
water was removed.
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
There was no observation in the reporting period.
|
N/A
|
|
|
25 Jan
2024
|
Accumulation of rubbish were observed.
|
The rubbish was
removed.
|
|
1 Feb
2024
|
Drip tray should be provided for oil/chemical containers to prevent
leakage. (Top of WVB)
|
The chemical
containers were removed.
|
|
8 Feb
2024
|
Waste chemical containers were observed in the WVB.
|
The waste
chemical containers had been removed.
|
|
8 Feb
2024
|
General refuses were observed at the rooftop of WVB.
|
The waste had
been removed.
|
|
15 Feb
2024
|
Drip tray should be provided to prevent chemical leakage. (OHVD).
|
The chemical
containers had been removed.
|
|
29 Feb
2024
|
Accumulation of rubbish was observed at tunnel entrance.
|
To be reported
in the next reporting month.
|
|
29 Feb
2024
|
Drip tray should be provided for chemical containers and accumulation
of containers were observed.
|
To be reported
in the next reporting month.
|
|
|
N/A
|
There was no observation in the reporting period.
|
N/A
|
10.5
The
Event and Action Plans for air quality, construction noise, and landscape and
visual are presented in Appendix J.
Air Quality Monitoring
·
No Action and Limit Level
exceedance for 24-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.
Construction Noise
Monitoring
·
No Action and Limit Level
exceedance was recorded in the reporting month.
Landscape and Visual
·
No landscape and visual
non-conformity was recorded.
10.6
According the Section 11.3.2.1
(c) of the EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013), status of required submission
under EP-451/2013 during the reporting period are summarized in Table 10.2.
Table 10.2 Status of
Required Submission under Environmental Permit
|
EP Condition
|
Submission
|
Submission Date
|
|
|
|
Condition
2.3
|
Management
Organization of Main Construction Companies
|
|
|
Condition
2.4
|
Design
Drawing of the Project
|
|
|
Condition
2.5
|
Landscape
Mitigation Plan (Rev. F)
|
|
|
Condition
2.10 (a)
|
Supplementary Contamination
Assessment Plan
|
|
|
Condition
2.10 (b)
|
Supplementary
Contamination Assessment Report
|
|
|
Condition
3.3
|
Updated
Baseline Monitoring Report
|
|
|
Condition
3.4
|
Monthly
EM&A Report (January 2024)
|
|
11.1
The summaries of environmental complaint,
warning, summon and notification of successful prosecution for the Project is
presented in Appendix L.
11.2
The summary of exceedance
record in the reporting month is shown in Appendix M.
11.3
No non-conformity was recorded
for landscape and visual inspections conducted in the reporting month.
Tentative construction programmes for the
next three months are provided in Appendix
N.
12.1
Major site activities
undertaken for the coming months and the key environmental issues are
summarized as follows:
Table 12.1 Summary Table for Site Activities and the Key
Environmental Issues in the next Reporting Period
|
Contract
No. and Project Title
|
Site Activities (March 2024)
|
Key
Environmental Issues
|
|
ED/2018/04
- Trunk Road T2 and Infrastructure Works for Developments at South Apron
|
1.
West Ventilation Building RC Structure, ABWF, E&M
2.
Launching Shaft / Cut & Cover RC Structure
3.
Westbound TBM Tunnelling
4.
Eastbound TBM Tunnelling
5.
EB Service Gallery Installation
6.
WB Service Gallery Installation
7.
CP Tympanum Construction
8.
CP TBM Excavation
9.
Cross Passage Finishing
10.
Sub-sea Corbel Construction
11.
Sub-sea Crown Fire Board
12.
Sub-sea Road Level Fire Board
13.
Sub-sea OHVD Soffit Fire Board
14.
Sub-sea Parapet Installation
15.
SUS Remaining Internal Wall
16.
SUS Fire Board Road Level
17.
Tunnel Segment delivery
18.
Sub-sea OHVD Slab Installation
19.
MiMEP Installation
20.
Sub-sea E&M Bracket installation
21.
Sub-sea E&M installation
22.
Sub-sea E&M drilling
23.
Eastbound cavern excavation
|
·
Wheel washing bay at site exits;
·
Temporary noise barriers for PMEs;
·
Sedimentation tank for settling muddy water; and
·
Make sure open stockpiles are covered during rainstorm.
|
|
ED/2020/03
- Trunk Road T2 - Traffic Control And Surveillance System (TCSS) and
Associated Works(1)
|
1.
WVB Cabinets lifting
|
|
Notes:
(1): No major construction work was undertaken during reporting month.
N/A: Not applicable
|
12.2
The tentative environmental
monitoring schedule for the next three months are shown in Appendix B.
13.1
This is the 48th
Monthly EM&A Report which presents the EM&A works undertaken during the
reporting month in accordance with the EM&A Manual (AEIAR-174/2013) and
the requirement under EP.
Air
Quality Monitoring
13.2
No Action and Limit Level
exceedance was recorded for 24-hour TSP monitoring in the reporting month.
Construction
Noise Monitoring
13.3
No Limit Level exceedance was
recorded for day-time construction noise monitoring in the reporting month.
13.4
No Action Level exceedance was
recorded in the reporting month.
Site Audit
13.5
5 (Five) ET joint weekly
environmental site inspections were conducted for the Contact No. ED/2018/04 in
the reporting month.
13.6
1 (One) ET joint environmental site
inspections were conducted for the Contact No. ED/2020/03 in the reporting
month.
Complaint, Notification of Summons and
Successful Prosecution
13.7
No environmental complaint was
received in the reporting month. No notifications of summons and successful
prosecutions were received in the reporting month.
13.8
According to the environmental
audit performed in the reporting month, the following recommendations was made:
ED/2018/04
Air Quality
·
The cement bags should be covered when not in used.
Water Quality
·
The stagnant water should be removed regularly.
Waste / Chemical Management
·
The drip tray should be provided for the chemical container to avoid the
chemical leakage and remove the used chemical containers regularly.
·
The waste in the skips should be cleared regularly, the site and
surrounding should be kept tidy and
litter free
